This flashcard is just one of a free flashcard set. See all flashcards!
42
Cascade Natural Gas v. El Paso Nat'l Gas (notes)
Defining "interest" in intervention.
El Paso acquired Pacific, this violated anti-trust. As court considered divestiture, 3 parties intervened:
1. California, which wanted to restore Pacific as competition for El Paso
2. Southern California Edison, large user of natural gas that had an interest in competition
3. Cascade, who used Pacific as its sole supplier and would have to use its successor after the divestiture.
H - interventions allowed, implied broad interest
El Paso acquired Pacific, this violated anti-trust. As court considered divestiture, 3 parties intervened:
1. California, which wanted to restore Pacific as competition for El Paso
2. Southern California Edison, large user of natural gas that had an interest in competition
3. Cascade, who used Pacific as its sole supplier and would have to use its successor after the divestiture.
H - interventions allowed, implied broad interest
Tags: Intervention
Source:
Source:
Flashcard info:
Author: stgillian
Main topic: Law
Topic: Civil Law
School / Univ.: Tulane
City: New Orleans, LA
Published: 02.03.2010